Posts Tagged Liberty

Why do we oft progress in reverse?

In “the 5000 year leap” by Cleon W. Skousen, he points out a common flaw among civilizations, our tendency to progress in reverse.  To describe this, I pull a passage from the book:

Unfortunately, every new generation of human beings seems to feel the instinctive and passionate necessity to reinvent the sociological wheel.  The physical sciences capitalize on the lessons of the past, but the social sciences seldom do.

In Political and social relations, a single generation will sometimes duplicate the same error half-a-dozen times.  Too many humans beings are doing it today.

They are muddling their lives with drugs, riots, revolutions, and terrorism; predatory wars; unnatural  sexual practices; merry-go-round marriages; organized crime; neglected and sometimes brutalized children; plateau intoxication ; debt-ridden prosperity; and all the other ingredients of insanity which have shattered twenty mighty civilizations in the past.

These elements of social decay can have a devastating impact on the highly technical and delicately interdependent civilizations which freedom and prosperity have brought to mankind.

I despise the use of the term “progressive” as it tends to be just the opposite in practice.  Those utilizing this label typically make efforts to somehow revive past ideas that have never worked, hoping this time they will.  Often, they act as if these are “new” ideas and “new” direction on where we need to go as a society. But why? Why don’t we simply progress utilizing the proven principles and concepts that have brought us this far instead of hoping that our current stature may finally support false concepts of digressed societies.

Its time we think about this:

The physical sciences capitalize on the lessons of the past, but the social sciences seldom do.

Post to Twitter

Tags: , ,

Persuasion vs. Force

I recently read a pamphlet by Mark Skousen entitled “Persuasion vs. Force” which largely and succinctly defines my view of political freedoms and economic liberty.  The purpose of the work is not to begin debating the nuances of society and management thereof but to put for a new precedent, a respect for all who are born on this earth and a philosophy to allow the debate through persuasion, not force.

As I have expressed in previous posts, I feel that socialism and interventionist agendas are disrespectful and attempts to play “God” as if certain groups and individuals have been given a special authority to control and force society, that they somehow know what is best for me when they don’t even know my name, situation, circumstance, nothing!  Skousen makes a powerful case for a society of mutual respect, education and persuasion.  Will bad still happen? of course! It happens anyway, no matter how much you legislate, it’s just considered “illegal” by the state.  Will there be no law? of course there will be law! Only these laws will merely protect us from each other and not from ourselves. As Mr Skousen put it:

We should permit the maximum degree of freedom in allowing people to choose what they think, act and do to themselves without harming others.

As a great leader once put it: “We teach them correct principles, and they govern themselves”

Just read the paper and let me know what you think…

Post to Twitter

Tags: , ,